Following The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Atlantic, the online encyclopedia now has daily activities ...

Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

Winning a quizzer. So here are five Premier League footballers and five lists of clubs and appearances from their Wikipedia ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.

An analysis found that about 40% of over 1,000 randomly selected Wikipedia articles contain outdated or incorrect information ...

Following a slew of complaints from editors, a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson confirmed to 404 Media that it’s pausing the two-week test, which began on June 2nd. The experiment put AI-generated ...

BJP leader Nishikant Dubey said ‘hooliganism’ is Raj Thackeray's sole purpose, which the MNS chief does ‘out of fear’ of ...

First reported by Kotaku, Wikipedia recently introduced a quiz game on its official Android app, called Which Came First? The game has a simple premise, which you could probably g ...

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.

The Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit group that hosts, develops, and controls Wikipedia, has announced that it won’t be moving forward with plans to add AI-generated summaries to articles after ...